While some workplace injuries resolve in a relatively short time, others continue to cause issues years after the initial injury. Employees are entitled to recover compensation for almost all work related injuries, but when an employee suffers more than one injury, it can become unclear who is responsible for providing…
Articles Posted in Workers’ Compensation
Massachusetts Court of Appeals Holds a Workers’ Compensation Insurer Is Not Barred from Re-Litigating Facts Determined in a Prior Proceeding
Collateral estoppel is a long-standing rule of law that people can only get “one bite of the apple.” In other words, people are not entitled to re-litigate the same facts or claims until they reach a verdict of their liking. There are certain requirements that must be met to preclude…
Employees Can Recover Benefits for Treatment Not Indicated Under Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Guidelines
If you are injured while performing the duties of your job, you are most likely entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Under Massachusetts workers’ compensation law, you are only entitled to benefits that are reasonable and related to your injury. There are guidelines set forth as to what treatment is considered…
Reinsurer Required to Pay Workers’ Compensation Benefits if Employer Becomes Insolvent
Under the Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) an individual who suffers a workplace injury is entitled to benefits. While obtaining benefits due to a covered injury is generally a relatively straightforward process, it can become complicated if your employer is unable to provide benefits. Generally, employers maintain insurance policies…
Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Reviewing Board Decision Reviews Affirmative Defenses
Insurers can raise an “affirmative defense” during the proceedings related to a claim for Massachusetts workers’ compensation benefits. One such defense is allowed by the Worker’s Compensation Act, which prevents someone from receiving benefits when they’ve rejected treatment that can lessen her or his suffering through reasonable remedies and operations…
Massachusetts Supreme Court Reviews Difference Between an Employee and Independent Contractor in Workers’ Compensation Claim
Massachusetts workers’ compensation is available to employees of businesses who are injured while performing duties for the employer in the scope of their employment. Whether or not benefits are issued to an injured person hinges on whether the injured person is considered to be an employee. The Massachusetts Supreme Court…
Massachusetts Appellate Court Affirms Administrative Decisions Awarding Benefits to Injured Bank Teller
The Commonwealth’s Appeals Court recently issued a Massachusetts workers’ compensation decision affirming the determinations made by the Administrative Judge and Reviewing Board granting temporary and permanent benefits to a bank teller who suffered a series of back injuries at work. The employee first reported transitory back pain in 2011, but…
Massachusetts Appeals Court Looks at Exclusivity Provision in Workers’ Compensation Act
The Workers’ Compensation Act has a provision that states that any employee who files a claim or accepts payment for a personal injury that occurs in the workplace releases their employer from any and all related claims. The Massachusetts appellate court recently issued a decision examining whether or not this…
Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Board Decision Examines Line Between Total and Partial Incapacitation
Workers’ compensation benefits make a distinction between two categories – whether an injured employee was partially disabled or totally disabled, and whether the disability was temporary in nature or permanent. Benefits are calculated based on the combination the injured worker possesses. Administrative hearings are conducted to help determine which category…
Payment of Injured Employee’s Surgery At Center of Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Dispute
A recently published Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Reviewing Board decision assessed an administrative decision ordering the insurer for the employer to pay reasonable and related medical expenses under sections 13 and 30 of the Workers’ Compensation Act. The insurer appealed the decision, arguing the administrative judge erred by ruling in the…