In Massachusetts, workers injured on the job may pursue compensation for their injuries under the Workers’ Compensation Act. However, issues of liability can arise when an employee seeks to hold a parent corporation responsible for a workplace accident at its subsidiary. A recent court decision clarified the extent of such liability and affirmed the application of Massachusetts’ statutory framework. If you were hurt while working, it is smart to consult an experienced Massachusetts’ workers’ compensation attorney to determine what steps you can take to protect your rights.
Case Setting
It is reported that the plaintiffs in this case were employees of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant operated by a subsidiary of a multinational corporation. Allegedly, while preparing a color solution in the plant’s coating area, a spark caused by static electricity ignited flammable vapors, leading to an explosion. The plaintiffs reportedly suffered severe burns and other injuries, for which they received workers’ compensation benefits.
It is alleged that the plaintiffs subsequently filed suit against the parent company, asserting that the parent company was a “responsible third party” under the Workers’ Compensation Act, as it allegedly controlled the subsidiary’s manufacturing processes and safety standards. The district court reportedly granted summary judgment in favor of the parent company, finding no evidence of liability. The plaintiffs appealed.
Third-Party Liability for Workplace Injuries
On review, the court reviewed whether the parent corporation could be deemed a responsible third party under Massachusetts’ Workers’ Compensation Act. Specifically, the court examined whether the parent company had assumed a duty to provide a safe working environment at its subsidiary.
The court relied on established precedent, which outlined that a parent corporation may only be liable if it expressly or implicitly undertakes the primary responsibility for safety at the subsidiary. The court emphasized that mere concern or minimal involvement in safety matters does not create such a duty. The evidence reportedly showed that the subsidiary’s management team controlled and implemented safety protocols, and the parent company did not assume responsibility for these duties.
The court reportedly found that the parent company’s actions, such as providing general safety guidance and expressing concern after the accident, were insufficient to establish liability. Furthermore, the court noted that any alleged negligence by the parent company in designing the manufacturing process was superseded by the subsidiary’s control over safety measures and procedures.
Ultimately, the court affirmed the district court’s summary judgment, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that the parent company assumed a duty to ensure workplace safety.
Seek Guidance from a Knowledgeable Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Attorney
Determining liability in workplace accidents involving parent and subsidiary corporations can be complicated. As such, if you were injured while working, it is smart to seek guidance from a trusted lawyer. Attorney James K. Meehan is an experienced Massachusetts’ workers’ compensation attorney with ample experience navigating complex claims and liability issues, and if he represents you, he will advocate zealously on your behalf. You can contact Attorney Meehan at 508-822-6600 or through our online form to schedule a confidential meeting.