In Massachusetts, workers injured on the job may pursue compensation for their injuries under the Workers’ Compensation Act. However, issues of liability can arise when an employee seeks to hold a parent corporation responsible for a workplace accident at its subsidiary. A recent court decision clarified the extent of such liability and affirmed the application of Massachusetts’ statutory framework. If you were hurt while working, it is smart to consult an experienced Massachusetts’ workers’ compensation attorney to determine what steps you can take to protect your rights.
Case Setting
It is reported that the plaintiffs in this case were employees of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant operated by a subsidiary of a multinational corporation. Allegedly, while preparing a color solution in the plant’s coating area, a spark caused by static electricity ignited flammable vapors, leading to an explosion. The plaintiffs reportedly suffered severe burns and other injuries, for which they received workers’ compensation benefits.
It is alleged that the plaintiffs subsequently filed suit against the parent company, asserting that the parent company was a “responsible third party” under the Workers’ Compensation Act, as it allegedly controlled the subsidiary’s manufacturing processes and safety standards. The district court reportedly granted summary judgment in favor of the parent company, finding no evidence of liability. The plaintiffs appealed.